Brightbox
  • Home
  • Pricing & Signup
  • Why Brightbox?
  • FAQs
  • Blog
  • Services
  • Support
  • About
  • Contact
Blog RSS feed
twitter_banner

Flickr


more images...

Recent Posts

  • Introducing Caius Durling
    1 day ago
  • Now with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Hardy powers
    5 days ago
  • "uninitialized constant REXML::VERSION" with Rails 2.1.1 and Rails 2.2
    3 weeks ago
  • RailsConf Europe 2008 Round-up
    4 weeks ago
  • HowTo do Ethernet Bonding on Ubuntu - Properly
    4 weeks ago

Archives

  • October 2008 (2)
  • September 2008 (3)
  • August 2008 (5)
  • July 2008 (1)
  • June 2008 (4)
  • May 2008 (4)
  • April 2008 (3)
  • March 2008 (3)
  • February 2008 (3)
  • January 2008 (4)
  • December 2007 (4)
  • November 2007 (3)
  • October 2007 (1)
  • August 2007 (7)
  • July 2007 (1)
  • June 2007 (3)

Popular tags

    • announcements
    • beta
    • dapper
    • launch
    • maintenance
    • network
    • pricing
    • rails hosting
    • ruby
    • security
    • tech
    • ubuntu
    • uk
    • updates
    • upgrade

Tag Cloud

announcements apache backport bandwidth beta brightbox brightbox gem brightbox team business cluster conference dapper datacentre events geekup gem hardy imagemagick launch leeds maintenance meetup mysql network notices packages passenger performance pricing rails railsconf railsconf europe rails hosting ruby ruby on rails san security staff team tech ubuntu uk updates upgrade xen

Posts tagged ‘ping’

It’s the latency, you see 20 Aug 07

I saw this question about Brightbox on a forum today:

what would be the advantages of hosting with a UK company over a US based company

One simple repercussion of hosting a site for a European audience on an ISP in the USA concerns the Atlantic ocean, which happens to be quite big and that means packets take a long time to traverse it. This results in higher latency. If your ISP is on the West Coast it’s even further away.

Some casual ping testing from a machine in the UK to a number of Rails hosts in the US showed between 95 and 161 millisecond round trip times. With HTTP ping testing I was seeing up to 327ms, which is likely due to the TCP handshake consisting of at least 2 packets before the request is even issued. From the same machine to a Brightbox (different ISPs of course) I saw around 15 milisecond ping RTT and 33 millisecond HTTP.

Average Ping RTT graph (smaller is better)

Ping test

Average HTTP RTT graph (smaller is better)

HTTP ping graph

With HTTP features such as persistent connections you can reduce the impact of the TCP handshake, but with these hosts your European visitors will still see up to 161ms delay before your Rails application even starts processing the request. Fragment caching won’t help you much there. With the new breed of AJAX web applications this is a huge impact on how responsive things will feel to your visitors.

This wasn’t a scientific test with double blind trials, lab coats and conical flasks but it gives you an idea of what a difference 5,500 kilometers makes.

Posted 20 August 2007 by John Leach • 1 comment

latency+ network+ ping+ tech+ uk


Recent blog posts

  • Introducing Caius Durling
    1 day ago
  • Now with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Hardy powers
    5 days ago
  • “uninitialized constant REXML::VERSION” with Rails 2.1.1 and Rails 2.2
    27 days ago
  • RailsConf Europe 2008 Round-up
    28 days ago
  • HowTo do Ethernet Bonding on Ubuntu - Properly
    28 days ago
  • HowTo Update Rubygems by hand
    about 1 month ago

Join our email list

Flickr (more...)

RSS feeds

Blog feed

Flickr feed

Recent Wiki updates

System Status feed




Brightbox Partners and Vendors

Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Site map | Wiki

Copyright © 2008 Brightbox Systems Ltd. All rights reserved